This study examines whether the BCT is adequately trained to properly employ CA teams in the contemporary environment by examining past contingency operations, current Army doctrine, and CA doctrine. Additionally, this study obtains information through Army training centers, Army research centers and live subjects. The study concludes that most commanders, units, and staffs: 1) focus on lethal effects; 2) do not understand the mission of non-lethal units due to doctrine and training; 3) do not understand the limits and capabilities of non-lethal units. Additionally, the commander's attitude directly determines the level of non-lethal unit integration and CA personnel do not understand CA doctrine. The study recommends the following changes: The Army should update CA and Army doctrine to include: 1) COIN operations; 2) guidance on non-lethal unit integration and employment; 3) define CAT-B role when CAT-A teams are task organized within a gaining unit; 4) require CA limits and capabilities in the OPORD; 5) reexamine battle command and decisive point definitions. The Army should train leaders and CA personnel to learn CA limits and capabilities. Training should be conducted at all Army training and mobilization centers to incorporate CA personnel into the gaining unit's planning, execution, and post mission operations. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.